" though you are right to imply that the chapter is over-sensitive to
criticism... "

John, I must have missed that bit as I didn't see Katie imply that at all.
If anything, I think the chapter receives, and always has received, a lot
of unwarranted criticism from people who have ill-defined issues with how
it operates. Some people have always been very quick to rush to criticism
rather than gently join a conversation. Others simply have an axe to grind.

The chapter is doing a good job. Wouldn't it be nice if we heard people say
that more often?

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 6:49 PM, John Byrne <j...@bodkinprints.co.uk> wrote:

> As very often in recent years, I got a notification of my post sent an
> hour or so ago, with completely blank text.  Yet Katie has clearly seen it,
> as she quotes me. Have others also got blanks? Can the rather cryptic
> instructions for replies be clarified, or is there some bug?  I get the
> digest version.  It doesn't exactly encourage people to contribute, and may
> be a factor in the much lower activity on this list in recent years. It
> never used to happen.
>
> No Katie, I don't think this has much to do with it, though you are right
> to imply that the chapter is over-sensitive to criticism...
>
> John/Johnbod
>
>
> On 10 April 2018 at 18:37 wikimediauk-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org wrote:
>
>
> Send Wikimediauk-l mailing list submissions to
> wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> wikimediauk-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> wikimediauk-l-ow...@lists.wikimedia.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Wikimediauk-l digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
> 1. Re: UK chapter membership numbers (Charles Matthews) 2. UK chapter
> membership numbers (John Byrne) 3. Re: UK chapter membership numbers (Katie
> Chan) 4. Re: UK chapter membership numbers (Richard Nevell)
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 14:25:51 +0100 (BST)
> From: Charles Matthews
> To: UK Wikimedia mailing list
> Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] UK chapter membership numbers
> Message-ID: <1623281894.198396.1523366751...@mail2.virginmedia.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> On 10 April 2018 at 11:41 Fæ wrote:
>
> It appears that the jump in numbers was a one-off event, there has
> been no continued growth since whatever happened.
>
>
> I don't know what happened. I did correspond with the office about a
> prompt to renew. One could simulate such a "one-off event" by simply asking
> people whose membership had lapsed to renew. I was doing this sort of thing
> for WMUK some seven years ago, so as an explanation it is not far-fetched.
>
> Charles
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 17:31:33 +0100 (BST)
> From: John Byrne
> To: wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Subject: [Wikimediauk-l] UK chapter membership numbers
> Message-ID: <522111329.168305.1523377893...@email.1and1.co.uk>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 18:31:14 +0100
> From: Katie Chan
> To: UK Wikimedia mailing list
> Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] UK chapter membership numbers
> Message-ID: <7mbf1d6v6k6decqn08p662nx.1523381474...@email.android.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
>
>
> Oh I don't know, maybe this "yawning gap" wouldn't be so wide if the
> chapter don't get criticised for both not increasing its membership numbers
> and having increased its membership numbers.
> Just a wide guess....
> KTC
>
> Sent from my Samsung device
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 17:37:12 +0000
> From: Richard Nevell
> To: UK Wikimedia mailing list
> Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] UK chapter membership numbers
> Message-ID:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Dear Fae,
>
> My memory could be failing me, but I thought it was explained at the AGM
> that the increase was a result of asking donors to become members.
>
> It sounds like you are more interested in the 'how' of the process and the
> 'who' as you seem dissatisfied with the answer to *why* there was an
> increase. To make sure we're on the same page is that what you meant?
>
> Regards,
> Richard Nevell
>
> PS. Have you had a chance to look into the issue on Commons with the
> conflicting licence for some images from the Portable Antiquities Scheme?
> My question was archived before a reply.
>
>
> On 10 April 2018 at 11:41, Fæ wrote:
>
> Yes, at the AGM the tripling of membership numbers was explained as
> being due to an increase in members joining. No meaningful facts were
> presented to the members, but the impression given by the Chair and
> the CEO was that there would be more information publicly available.
>
> My question was "why". Sharing information about any discussion the
> trustees have had on improving protection against entryism, would be
> healthy for transparency, as would sharing exactly what happened that
> caused this massive, overnight, leap in membership totals. Currently,
> there is zero information on the nature of who joined, which may have
> been down to how they joined. As an example, if 351 people joined at
> an academic conference in London, then the people joining would be
> academics who go to events in London and if the 351 new members were
> found due to appeals by the CEO on Facebook, then the new members
> would be limited to people who follow or network with the CEO on
> Facebook.
>
> It appears that the jump in numbers was a one-off event, there has
> been no continued growth since whatever happened. Should the chapter
> start maintaining the published membership report again, then it will
> be possible for people apart from chapter employees to have access to
> the latest facts.
>
> Thanks,
> Fae
>
> On 9 April 2018 at 22:01, Richard Nevell
> wrote:
>
> Dear Fae,
>
> As was explained at the AGM the increase in the number of members was the
> result of a successful membership drive.
>
> Regards,
> Richard Nevell
>
>
> On 9 Apr 2018 21:34, "Fæ" wrote:
>
> During the last UK Chapter AGM, it was asked why the membership
> numbers had radically changed, there was no specific answer to the
> question. Was any analysis done on this afterwards? When reviewing
> membership it seems likely that the charity's trustees would have been
> concerned at these figures so shortly before the AGM, due to the
> potential risk of entryism.
>
> Membership jumped from a total of 147 (a five year low) in May 2017,
> to the all time record high the following month of 498, i.e. new
> sign-ups that month more than *tripled* the total membership.
>
> A second question - the report of membership numbers has been updated
> every month for the past five years.[1] It has not been updated since
> October 2017. Could anyone confirm what the most recent membership
> numbers are so the report can be updated?
>
> P.S. the links in the FAQ about the register of members are out of
> date, the companylawclub link is a 404 error and the companieshouse
> link advises to go to their new website.
>
> Links:
>
>    1. https://wikimedia.org.uk/wiki/Membership/Numbers
>
>
> 2.
>
> https://wikimedia.org.uk/wiki/Volunteers_-_Frequently_Asked_
> Questions#Why_do_you_keep_a_register_of_members.3F
> >
>
> Thanks,
> Fae
> --
> fae...@gmail.com https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia UK mailing list
> wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
> WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia UK mailing list
> wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
> WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
>
>
>
> --
> fae...@gmail.com https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia UK mailing list
> wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
> WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimediauk-l mailing list
> Wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of Wikimediauk-l Digest, Vol 153, Issue 5
> *********************************************
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia UK mailing list
> wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
> WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk

Reply via email to