Why though? Then what purpose does it serve to have changed WP to CC-BY-SA if it still prevents copying from WP to WN or the likes? In that sense, it really makes no logical sense. I thought the goal was to make the WP license more compatible with other project licenses? If so then changing it to CC-BY-SA isn't doing that at all (aside from commons).
-- Jason Safoutin Wikinews accredited reporter and administrator [email protected] Paul Williams wrote: > 2009/5/30 Jason Safoutin <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > Why could we not copy from WP? SA is just the basic same as regular CC > BY. If copying from WP will still not be allowed, then why did they go > through the trouble to even change the license if its still not > compatible with other projects? > > > CC-BY is not the same as CC-BY-SA - we (Wikinews) must publish our > content under CC-BY-SA if we wish to copy from WP. > > Regards, > > Paul Williams > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Wikinews-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikinews-l > -- Jason Safoutin Wikinews accredited reporter and administrator [email protected] _______________________________________________ Wikinews-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikinews-l
