Gopher,

I've been ultra-busy, but - assuming you explicityly CC'd the
correspondent, thanks for such a professional and polite response.



B.


On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 22:14 -0600, gopher65 wrote:
> Sorry for the confusion. We're not accusing you of spamming in general, 
> we're pointing out that anything that is posted to Wikinews must be *news*. 
> As in, a factual representation of events that have happened in the past 3 
> days. Nothing older than 3 days is accepted (it's not news if it isn't new), 
> and editorials are not considered news.
> 
> Anything that doesn't qualify as news is considered spam and deleted, even 
> if it isn't posted with ill intent.
> 
> If a significant event happens in (or to) the dyslexia community then you 
> could write a news article about that event on Wikinews... as long as the 
> significant event was less than 3 days old. A significant event would be 
> something like a new medical discovery about dyslexia, or (potentially) even 
> a large conference about dyslexia.
> 
> But editorials or personal anecdotes will never be accepted on Wikinews. 
> That simply isn't what the site is for. That's what blogs are for.
> 
> Thank you for your interest in Wikinews. I hope that this encounter hasn't 
> soured your opinion of us or our site.
> 
> gopher65
> 
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Luqman Michel" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 7:36 PM
> To: <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Wikinews-l] Dyslexia - A new perspective
> 
> > michael west <michawest <at> gmail.com> writes:
> >
> >>
> >> On 18/03/2010, luqman michel <luqmanm2002 <at> yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> >> > Dear Sir,
> >> > I would be grateful if you could kindly let me know why my article
> >> > "Dyslexia - A new perspective" was not published (deleted).
> >> >
> >> > Just want to know why?
> >> > Thank you and kind regards,
> >> > Luqman Michel
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Visit my blog at: http://www.parentingdyslexia.com
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> I don't think it was published because Wikinews is not a spammed
> >> article board. A quick google search lists the article on countless
> >> sites.
> >>
> > Thank you for your response. I want my article to be made known to as many
> > people, who may be interested in dyslexia, as possible. To - date no one 
> > has
> > disputed on what I have written.If writing to get my findings to as many
> > people as possible is considered spamming that I am guilty.However, no one 
> > to
> > date has accused me of spamming.Wish you well.
> > Luqman Michel
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikinews-l mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikinews-l
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Wikinews-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikinews-l
> 



-- 
Brian McNeil <[email protected]>
Wikinewsie.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Wikinews-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikinews-l

Reply via email to