Hoi,
Having read the article, does it not make more sense and use Semantic
MediaWiki? This does provide an equivalence to the microformats without all
the overhead that is brought with yet another non integrated approach.
Thanks,
GerardM
2009/1/21 Magnus Manske <[email protected]>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microformat
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Gerard Meijssen
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hoi,
> > Can you explain what this is about. The blog you refer to does not make
> any
> > sense to me. From my perspective, the last thing that I want is more
> clutter
> > and as it is not obvious what this is about, I would consider it clutter.
> > Thanks,
> > GerardM
> >
> > 2009/1/20 Magnus Manske <[email protected]>
> >
> >> I just saw this:
> >> http://developer.yahoo.net/blog/archives/2009/01/wikipedia_w_yql.html
> >>
> >> Apparently, microformats are getting more easy to use, and are thus
> >> increasingly used. We do use some microformats, but could we use more,
> >> especially automated via templates?
> >>
> >> Magnus
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Wikipedia-l mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikipedia-l mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
>
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
