Yury Tarasievich wrote:
> Ray Saintonge wrote:
>   
>> Thomas Dalton wrote:
>>     
>>>> But the fact is, Who's who is/was also based on user-submitted
>>>> autobiographies.  The editors made a list of people who "should"
>>>> be in there, and sent invitations with a form where the person
>>>> could fill in details about family, education, career,
>>>> publications, awards, and hobbies.  I'm not sure how the editors
>>>> fact checked the entries.  Perhaps the risk of public shame was
>>>> enough to keep people from lying.    
>>>>         
>>> What makes you think people didn't lie?
>>>       
>> What makes you think they did?
>>     
> Because people tend to sort of do this thing, in 
> such circumstances -- tone up the positives, 
> tone down the negatives. I was translating the 
> entries for the equivalent of the mentioned 
> biographical dictionaries once. Another example 
> is how like everybody's bio in post-Soviets of 
> 1990s sort of suddenly lost any relation to the 
> Communist party.
>
>   
Failing to tell the *whole* truth by selective omissions is not the same 
as a lie, which would be to make claims that are knowingly false.  If 
the 1985 and 1995 editions of a biographical dictionary treat a person's 
Communist Party association differently that doesn't change the fact 
that both of those editions were in fact published  You can compare the 
two editions, and note any differences.

Sure, *some* people will tend to do this sort of thing, but that is not 
the same as accusing all biographies there of being full of lies.

Ec

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l

Reply via email to