I can't agrre to the argumentation of Lars, that index and page name spaces are a bad solution. I think ThomasV has seen the problems of mixing articles and scan pages in a single work space. In de.ws we had this, before we started with ThomasV (PR2) extension. In the beginning I can't see any benefit from this method and argued against it. But meantime after working quite a long time with ThomaV System, I see that it is more comfortable to make a difference between the working place (index / page) and the presentation room (main) workspace.
And I think most of our community is thinking the same way. New projects are started with PR2, the number of projects startet with PR1 (the js-solution we had before) extension is nearly to zero. We are working on transfering older projects to PR2, even with the inherited problems mentioned above. @ThomasV, my reply to your last post, 3 hours ago "They want *IP*s to be *allowed to modify quality levels*, but they also agree with the extension *forbidding* to the *same use**r to set both q3 and q4*, or to *set q4 **directly*." ( bold settings are done by me) *I agree completely* to this statement you've extracted from your discussion with paulis and pdd. I'm quite confident, that this can be called a consens in the de.community. But there is * one wish **from** me*, is there a possibilty, to add a solution for transfering a validated old project to your PR2 extension directly - maybe be giving (an) admin the right to set q4 directly - but restricted to that purpose. Greetings joergens.mi 2010/7/3 Andrea Zanni <zanni.andre...@gmail.com> > > But my suggestion is that we start to compile a catalog >> of such problems, rather than submitting bug reports. >> Where is a good place to start? >> >> > Could it be this very mailing list, because AFAIK there is no active page > for discussing about intersource matters. > Another place could be Gdansk: probably several of us are willing to go to > Wikimania, > an I consider it a crucial occasion to meet, discuss and understand each > other. > Wikisources are many, very different and extremely complicated, but with > great, huge potential. > Best thing we can do is to see each other in the eyes and start creating a > proper intersource community, > sharing experiences, competences and ideas. > I'll be there, hope you'll be too. Maybe we can arrange a meeting. > > Aubrey > > _______________________________________________ > Wikisource-l mailing list > Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l > >
_______________________________________________ Wikisource-l mailing list Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
