Yeah, this looks like a brilliant project. Well done! I agree, the variety (to put it nicely) of categorisation for works' pages in NS0 makes for interesting working, with automated tools. I've been attempting to do various things with enws validated works for a while... :)
Do you know much about OPDS? http://opds-spec.org/about/ It seems, on the surface, a good way to expose WS works to the outside world. I've wondered about implementing it (limited, as you say, to validated and proofread works only). Would that sort of thing work nicely with your library systems? —sam. On Fri, April 17, 2015 12:13 am, Andrea Zanni wrote: > Nope :-) > > I plan on publish the (small) scripts I used on GithHub, but, the Learning > Pattern is a good idea. > Not sure how useful, though, because it really depends on the "receiving" > library/service, and also on the Wikisource you are using. > Everyone is different and the "works" (the texts in namespace 0) have > different categories... > But thanks for the suggestion. > > Aubrey > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Nicolas VIGNERON < > vigneron.nico...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Kudos ! >> >> Did you documented this with further details somewhere ? (a patern on >> meta >> for instance). >> >> Cdlt, ~nicolas >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikisource-l mailing list >> Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Wikisource-l mailing list > Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l > _______________________________________________ Wikisource-l mailing list Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
