Following work by WMDE at Wikidata, there will now be the ability to
tag/badge works at Wikidata as to their proofread status.  The badges have
been kept simple, and should reflect the colour that is used for a work's
page status.

I recommended an implementation of three
* incomplete (be it not be proofread, or problematic)
* proofread once
* proofread twice = validated

This will mean that we should be looking to an agreed approach to its use.
I suggest that this have some onwiki work, with a discussion to follow at
Wikisource Wien Workabout (WWW)

Regards, Billinghurst

The detail ...

Add default badges for Wikisource

With site css, each Wikisource community can override
these defaults.

The defaults are coloured circles. To start with, these match
what we have for Wikibase Repo (e.g. Wikidata), except not (yet?)
have one for 'not proofread'.

* problematic / incomplete
* proofread
* validated

Bug: T97014
Change-Id: I5ad5270866a0a5b8fbc7a19b194f800c2b0e9a8a
---
A resources/images/badge-notproofread.png
A resources/images/badge-notproofread.svg
A resources/images/badge-problematic.png
A resources/images/badge-problematic.svg
A resources/images/badge-proofread.png
A resources/images/badge-proofread.svg
A resources/images/badge-validated.png
A resources/images/badge-validated.svg
M resources/skins/cologneblue/wikimedia-badges.css
M resources/skins/modern/wikimedia-badges.css
M resources/skins/monobook/wikimedia-badges.css
M resources/skins/vector/wikimedia-badges.css
12 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)


To view the specific changes, visit https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/229199
_______________________________________________
Wikisource-l mailing list
Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l

Reply via email to