> 2016-11-03 10:12 GMT+01:00 Andrea Zanni <zanni.andre...@gmail.com>: > >> Thanks Mathieu. >> What really strikes me is that challenge is doable in fr.wikisource: in >> many others would be complete madness ;-) >> Also, Polish Wikisource is doing great. >> >> What interest me is understanding how they are building their community >> of >> active and super-active proofreaders: are they doing something that >> other >> wikisource aren't? >> > > Not sure if there is a link but when you mention fr.ws and pl.ws I can > immediately think of a correlation since these two are among the rare > wikisources which are prooferead system only (or nearly only : 92 % and 96 > % of mainspace pages back with scan, see > http://tools.wmflabs.org/phetools/statistics.php). > > Cdlt, ~nicolas
In pl.ws we have a policy that if a text *can* be processed using ProofreadPage (legal aspects, scan availability) then it *has to* be processed using this extention. Ankry _______________________________________________ Wikisource-l mailing list Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
