The page history is completely missing, as well as a link to the GFDL-copy, the mobile mirror is therefore not GFDL-conform.
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 12:07 AM, Chad <innocentkil...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think for anything other than casual browsing, using > native clients would be better. Perfect use of the API. > I've been trying to get one for Android into decent > shape. > > -Chad > > On Feb 19, 2009 6:03 PM, "Brion Vibber" <br...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > > On 2/19/09 4:14 AM, Angela wrote: > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 9:42 PM, David > Gerard<dger...@gmail.com>... > That depends on how many people have been announcing new mobile > platforms. :) > > In this work we're mainly targeting the popular has-a-good-browser > smartphones. These will be able to do decent editing at least for little > bits here and there, and creating a decent interface for doing that -- > commenting, typo-fixing, slapping up pictures, maybe taking notes for > later "serious" editing -- would be great. > > The first attack surface is a decent read-and-search UI, of course, > since that's going to be the biggest use. > > -- brion > > _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list > wikitec...@lists.wikimedia.... > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
