Aryeh Gregor schreef: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 7:49 AM, Mark Clements (HappyDog) > <gm...@kennel17.co.uk> wrote: >> Is there a noticeable performance difference between the two methods if >> memcached is not available? Obviously this is not applicable to WMF wikis, >> but I imagine the majority of wikis run without any external caching (beyond >> whatever is present in MW itself). > > In this case, going to the database is drastically slower. On the > other hand, you have to go to the database anyway, because you don't > know if the message exists in the database without querying it. So > there's probably no big difference in this case either. Also note that by default, the objectcache table in the database will be used to cache messages in.
Roan Kattouw (Catrope) _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
