Well, it isn't all that clear to me, but I really don't care. I'll change it to whatever people want. "Call me anything you like, but don't call me late for dinner."
Can someone tell me how the --fuzz option is supposed to behave? I am cross-testing the new parserTests parameter in conjunction with its other parameters. I have tested --quick and --quiet. They seem to work fine with ktf-to-fail. When I test --fuzz, parserTests seems to go on walkabout in the Great Australian desert periodically spewing out stuff like: 100: 100/100 (mem: 36%) 200: 200/200 (mem: 37%) 300: 300/300 (mem: 37%) 400: 400/400 (mem: 37%) 500: 500/500 (mem: 38%) 600: 600/600 (mem: 38%) .... Is this expected behavior? Is parserTests supposed to finish when you use --fuzz or is this some kind of stress test that the never finishes? --- On Wed, 7/22/09, Chad <innocentkil...@gmail.com> wrote: > From: Chad <innocentkil...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] Known to fail interactions with compare and record > To: "Wikimedia developers" <wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org> > Date: Wednesday, July 22, 2009, 4:25 PM > Which is exactly what my param means. > Its expected > that failures will be reported, and --with-known-to-fail > would indicate that known failures will be added. > > --knowntofail-to-fail and --ktf-to-fail certainly aren't > any > clearer. > > -Chad > > On Jul 22, 2009 7:22 PM, "dan nessett" <dness...@yahoo.com> > wrote: > > > If anyone can come up with a better option name, I would be > happy to replace > ktf-to-fail. I generally don't like cryptic abbreviations. > However, > "with-known-to-fail" doesn't really get at the underlying > meaning of the > option. It specifies that known-to-fail test results are > accumulated as > failures for the purpose of parserTest statistics. > > --- On Wed, 7/22/09, Chad <innocentkil...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > From: Chad <innocentkil...@gmail.com> > > > Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] Known to fail interactions > with compare and > record > > To: "Wikimedia developers" <wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org> > > Date: Wednesday, July 22, 2009, 4:15 PM > > > Why not just call it > --with-known-to-fail? Easy. > > > -Chad > > On Jul > 22, 2009 7:11 PM, "dan n... > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikitech-l mailing list > > wikitec...@lists.wikim... > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
