2010/6/13 Chad <innocentkil...@gmail.com>: > 1) iw_trans - I don't think this needs to become more than a > boolean like it is. If we allow transwiki inclusion, we'll have > to use a DB or API connection. Since a DB connection will > always be preferable to an HTTP request to the API, it would > be safe to use the existence of a db name as an indicator to > use it, else fall back to the API. > I agree with this: direct DB access is always better.
> 2) iw_dbname / iw_api - You could probably combine these into > one column. It could store a value like "dbname=abc;api=http://foo.com/etc"; > which would be loaded and split when the Interwiki object is > constructed. > I think this is ugly. There's plenty of other cases in which we're just using separate fields like we're supposed to. Although I don't foresee any problems with cramming this stuff into one field, I would prefer putting them in separate fields. Roan Kattouw (Catrope) _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
