What's broken about it? It seems very odd to me that the mean is an order of magnitude greater than the 95th percentile, but otherwise it all looks fine. I suspect there are a few invalid data points messing with the mean - perhaps pending changes is being turned off on articles while there are unreviewed edits and they are counting as being unreviewed for ages? (Or perhaps only if PC is turned back on again for that article and they are eventually reviewed days after being made.)
If that is the problem, then I would suggest disallowing turning off PC on an article with revisions still pending. Alternatively, turning off PC could automatically approve any pending changes. On 27 June 2010 20:19, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Is anyone working on fixing the broken output from > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:ValidationStatistics ? > > I brought this up on IRC a week-ish ago and there was some speculation > as to the cause but it wasn't clear to me if anyone was working on > fixing it. > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
