Artur Fijałkowski schrieb: > 2010/8/19 Daniel Kinzler <dan...@brightbyte.de>: > >> 2) extra channels that include full text, diffs, etc? UDP is a limiting >> factor >> here. Alternative transport from PHP to the bridge process? > > Named pipes? Of course only if PHP can keep named pipe open in > persistent mode. I'm not sure if this is easy or even possible at all > ;)
Never done much with these, but woudn't they get confused if multiple php processes accessed a named pipe at once? also, can a named pipe be connected to a tcp stream? Hm, I guess the letter could simply by done with cat my.pipe | socat tcp:... Otoh, I don't think opening the pipe for every edit (not request!) would be prohibitively expensive. Might be a possibility. Actually, XMLRC already supports writing to a file, so no change to the extension would be needed at all. -- daniel _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
