On 2010-09-02, MZMcBride wrote: > Aryeh Gregor wrote: > > What's the alternative? There are *always* going to be many more > > ideas than implementers. Ideas are cheap. Wikimedia has to decide > > which features are the most critical to invest developer time in. > > Their decision is not going to make everyone happy. The only > > guarantee you can ever have is if you do it yourself. Happily, > > MediaWiki is open-source, so you *do* have that option! On > > practically any other major website, you couldn't add a feature no > > matter how much you wanted to. > > The current status of Wikimedia code deployment makes this no longer > applicable to Wikimedia either.
See also: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23268 https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18461 https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15308 https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14207 https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15165 All asking for a feature which has been implemented since April 2008 to be reviewed and installed. Robert _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
