On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 4:09 AM, Rob Lanphier <ro...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > > So, 1.16wmf4 and 1.16 shared the same branch point, which was perhaps > the start of a tradition. Is this the new rule? I don't have a > strong opinion about whether that should be the case, but it does > change how I think about 1.17 planning. > I would strongly recommend this. Having a running MediaWiki on a top 10 site is a very good form of quality control. And this way we are at least sure that code is pushed to the WMF serves on a regular interval. (Although I would prefer a shorter interval, I'm not sure whether this is feasible at this moment)
Bryan _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
