On 12.11.2010, 21:45 Leo wrote: > Based on the input, here's another draft: > http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mediawiki_logo_reworked_2.svg
> The shadows are gone (as well as the black outline of the petals) and > the whole thing more simplified to better fit the "basic shapes look" > of the other logos. > I tried a version with red petals (as red is the only realistic color > out of red, blue & green) but I'm not a huge fan of it. It would as > well mean giving up the tournesol aspect (as there are no red > tournesols) The red version is here: > http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mediawiki_logo_reworked_2-red.svg Frankly, I don't like it. The current logo has the advantage of looking *alive*. The new design looks plastic and dead, the sunflower is less recognisable. Is there a problem with our current logo? Why using a photo in a logo makes it an automatic show-stopper? -- Best regards, Max Semenik ([[User:MaxSem]]) _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
