On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Nikola Smolenski <smole...@eunet.rs> wrote: > I have recently encountered this text in which the author claims very > high MySQL speedups for simple queries (7.5 times faster than MySQL, > twice faster than memcached) by reading the data directly from InnoDB > where possible (MySQL is still used for writing and for complex > queries.) Knowing that faster DB is always good, I thought this would be > an interesting thing to consider :) > > http://yoshinorimatsunobu.blogspot.com/2010/10/using-mysql-as-nosql-story-for.html
It's easy to get fast results if you don't care about your reads being atomic (*), and I find it hard to believe they've managed to get atomic reads without going through MySQL. (*) Among other possibilities, just use MyISAM. _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
