I have added Panos to Skype; yes, we should probably exchange Skype
handles off-list.

I am in Cambridge (London time), so that should work.

Cheers,
Magnus


On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Jan Paul Posma <jp.po...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Skype sounds great! Also, I heard you work with Ariel, which is great because 
> that way you have a more local person to contact with MediaWiki questions. 
> Perhaps we can get off-list with those interested to schedule an introductory 
> meeting? (You, me, Magnus, Ariel, others?) I am located in the Netherlands, 
> so our hours will be similar.
>
> Cheers,
> Jan Paul
>
> On 19-Jan-2011, at 19:47, Panos Louridas wrote:
>
>> Thanks to both Jean Paul and Magnus for taking up the offer!
>>
>> Based on your input I will look into our developer tool for people with 
>> expertise in the following:
>>
>> * Advanced JS, preferably with experience in optimisation issues etc.
>>
>> * UI design, usability testing, etc.
>>
>> * Text processing (of sorts) for the needs of SLE
>>
>> (if you believe I am missing something, say so)
>>
>> I expect to have the people in place in February, I will let you know. I 
>> will be following the list.
>>
>> Jean Paul indicated that we might talk in more detail. I do not follow IRC 
>> because of my tight schedule; I do use Skype, however (ID: louridas). Please 
>> Jean Paul, Magnus, and others, let me know if that suits you. As I am 
>> located in Athens, my waking hours are around East European Time.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Panos.
>>
>> On Jan 19, 2011, at 3:54 PM, Jan Paul Posma wrote:
>>
>>> A very generous offer indeed!
>>>
>>> My own SLE and Magnus' WYSIFTW are indeed the most active projects, so that 
>>> would be a good bet. Actually, for me the timing is just right, as I'll be 
>>> working on a paper about this editor for a while, so it'd be cool to have 
>>> someone(s) continue the project. If one of your researchers has a brilliant 
>>> idea on how to do this right, that would obviously be really valuable too.
>>>
>>> A lot of things Magnus mentioned apply to my project too:
>>> * Improving detection algorithms, i.e. better sentence-level editing 
>>> (perhaps using an external language recognition library), better detection 
>>> of other elements. Keep in mind that the editor excludes anything it 
>>> doesn't 'understand', so this is a nice fallback, you don't have to write a 
>>> complex parser that detects a lot of stuff at once.
>>> * Cross-browser/platform/device compatibility (think mobile, touchscreens, 
>>> etc.)
>>> * Usability testing (the more the merrier!)
>>> * Verifying detection coverage (Which % of the wikitext is editable) and 
>>> quality (Wikitext -> Adding markers -> MediaWiki parser -> Removing 
>>> markings -> Wikitext??) Checking this on a large number of pages.
>>> * Test suites (again, the more the merrier, but only for parts of the code 
>>> and interface that are considered stable!)
>>> * Lots of implementation details: embedding the (current) editor toolbar in 
>>> the textboxes, making sure (a fair percentage of) gadgets still work with 
>>> this, and handling unusual cases like edit conflicts, etc.
>>>
>>> Perhaps it'd be good to have a (video or IRC?) conversation with you, your 
>>> developers, people from the Foundation, and people from the specific 
>>> projects you want to contribute to. Again, really awesome that you guys 
>>> want to work on this! :-)
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Jan Paul
>>>
>>> On 19-Jan-2011, at 9:55, Magnus Manske wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Panos Louridas <louri...@grnet.gr> wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> At the Greek Research and Education Network (GRNET) we look at the 
>>>>> possibility of contributing to the development of WYSIWYG editor support 
>>>>> in Wikipedia. We understand that considerable work has already taken 
>>>>> place in the area, e.g.:
>>>>>
>>>>> * http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/WYSIFTW
>>>>> * https://svn.wikia-code.com/wikia/trunk/extensions/wikia/RTE/
>>>>> * http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:JanPaul123/Sentence-level_editing
>>>>>
>>>>> We therefore think that it will not be productive to reinvent the wheel 
>>>>> over here.
>>>>>
>>>>> Our contribution can take the form of providing developers that will 
>>>>> devote part (or all) of their time for some months in 2011. We welcome 
>>>>> any comments and suggestions on how we could push this forward, and in 
>>>>> particular:
>>>>>
>>>>> * Specific tasks / components that need to be designed, developed, 
>>>>> optimized, etc., and estimates of effort and timeframe.
>>>>
>>>> Hi Panos,
>>>>
>>>> a very generous offer! One I would like to take you up on, for WYSIFTW
>>>> as you no doubt have guessed :-)
>>>>
>>>> WYSIFTW is approaching feature completeness, as far as wiki markup
>>>> parsing is concerned, and improves on usability as well. (just try the
>>>> new "floating context hover boxes", in lack of a better name, that I
>>>> added last night, wich come up when you hover over a template or a
>>>> references, for show/hide and rendered preview, and the new optional
>>>> rendering for templates as a key-value-pair table)
>>>>
>>>> For support later this year, tasks would include
>>>> * increase parsing performance (mostly post-parsing steps, focusing on
>>>> DOM lookup and manipulation)
>>>> * improve editing usability (cut/copy/paste, better specialised
>>>> dialogs for images, table/row/cell properties etc.)
>>>> * usability testing (I'm using up volunteers fast ;-)
>>>> * creating a test suite (to make sure that changes don't accidentally
>>>> break anything)
>>>> * general compatibility testing (find pages that parse/unparse
>>>> wrongly, and patch the code accordingly)
>>>>
>>>> I like the sentence-level editing function, but once I add
>>>> section-level editing to WYSIFTW, these two will start to converge.
>>>> I'm curious which of these will be more suited to small fixes and
>>>> adding single sentences/references etc.
>>>>
>>>> As for RTE, I know little about. Apparently, it is not suitable for
>>>> Wikipedia in its current form. From brief looks at CKeditor, it might
>>>> be quite some work to make it behave nicely around parsed wikitext, as
>>>> used on Wikipedia.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Magnus
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Wikitech-l mailing list
>>>> Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wikitech-l mailing list
>>> Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikitech-l mailing list
>> Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikitech-l mailing list
> Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
>

_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to