I second the idea of the static Linker class. It's far better than the subclass system. Skin modification of links should focus on CSS anyway, rather than trying to overload link generating code.
Daniel Friesen-4 wrote: > > On 11-04-04 02:40 PM, Platonides wrote: >> I like it. Specially the Linker change. It really looks the way to have >> it. >> >>> I'm considering >>> making the Parser get it's linker via $po->getLinker(); (either >>> ParserOutput or ParserOptions, I need another look) >> The linker would be an input parameter, so it is a ParserOptions > Yeah, I just couldn't remember which set of code that was when I wrote > the e-mail... > > It's moot now anyways, since Linker is now used statically as Linker::* > instead. > > ~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name] > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Some-changes-to-%24wgOut%2C-%24wgUser%2C-Skin%2C-and-SpecialPage-code-patterns-tp31305991p31320028.html Sent from the Wikipedia Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
