On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 03:38, Platonides <platoni...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 14/12/11 22:33, Srikanth Lakshmanan wrote: > > Language support teams :- > > In order to force them, "if you don't test this it may break horribly > for you when deployed" seems way more convincing than "no new goodies > for you". > We tried telling people to test saying the same thing, may be should try telling them more often. > Development must continue even if ignored (do not confuse with negative > feedback), but blind coding without feedback is a dangerous zone. > +1 > > PS: I understand the criticism might have come hard on the India list, > > but we(critics) are getting used to a pattern beyond Webfonts. We alert > > of something dangerous on the cards, People(mostly WMF) tend to ignore > > us, Then they "firefight" and then we criticize more post the entire > > thing, "you would have been better had you to listened us". This has > > happened 3rd time on row now, other 2 being Protest against Jimbo at > > WikiConference India & IEP. I hope sooner, people take us seriously. > > It's not that Indian sites are treated worse, see the recent (similar) > issues in commons with EXIF. > Sorry I didn't quite get you, not sure if you got what i meant as well. I never said / meant / implied "Indian sites are treated worse", what I tried to convey was why the criticism on India list is high. -- Regards Srikanth.L _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l