Mark and I just discussed this, and he's going to look into having a "CONFIRMED" state. The flow would be:
"NEW"->"CONFIRMED" ...rather than: "UNCONFIRMED"->"NEW" That would also mean that all of the currently "NEW" bugs are presumed to be unconfirmed rather than confirmed, and that we can have a relatively clean list of bugs that someone explicitly declared to be confirmed. Rob On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Mark A. Hershberger <m...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > > I set up Bugzilla today so that, by default, bugs would be in the > "UNCONFIRMED" state. > > Next week, I plan to begin recruiting volunteers for the "Bug Squad", > who will help me to verify bugs by testing them against the Beta > cluster. The plan is that the Bug Squad will be able to verify these > bugs and change them to the "NEW" state. > > The Bug Squad idea comes from KDE's Bug Squad > (http://techbase.kde.org/Contribute/Bugsquad) and I've begun talking > with them. > > If you have an interest in helping out with or participating in the Bug > Squad, please contact me. > > -- > Mark A. Hershberger > Bugmeister > Wikimedia Foundation > m...@wikimedia.org > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
