> On 11 July 2012 14:16, Andre Klapper <andre_klap...@gmx.net> wrote:
> > KDE Bugzilla uses "RESOLVED UPSTREAM" for such cases,
> > Mer Project uses "RESOLVED TRIAGEDUPSTREAM" for such cases.

I need to correct myself:
Mer Bugzilla uses TRIAGEDUPSTREAM as a *state*, not as a resolution.

Also, MeeGo Bugzilla uses "WAITINGFORUPSTREAM" as a state too.

On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 17:11 +0300, Niklas Laxström wrote:
> I'm okay with state, but not at all with resolution code. From the
> reporters perspective the issue is not fixed when it is reported
> upstream. For example if our Gerrit is broken, the issue not resolved
> until a fix is applied in our installation.

Good point - somebody would have to reopen the ticket after the fix has
been committed upstream to get it deployed downstream (=WMF).

So instead of using a resolution, a status WAITINGFORUPSTREAM seems to
make more sense. Once a fix is available upstream somebody needs to
manually reset the bug report status to UNCONF | NEW | ASSIGNED.

andre
-- 
Andre Klapper (maemo.org bugmaster & GNOME Bugsquad)
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/


_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to