On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:22:05AM -0700, Asher Feldman wrote: > I think Solr is the right direction for us to go in. Current efforts can > pave the way for a complete refresh of WMF's article full text search as > well as how our developers approach information retrieval. We just need to > make sure that these efforts are unified, with commonality around the > client api, configuration, indexing (preferably with updates asynchronously > pushed to Solr in near real-time), and schema definition. This is > important from an operational aspect as well, where it would be ideal to > have a single distributed and redundant cluster.
I'm curious, has anyone evaluated ElasticSearch and whether it'd be more or less suitable for us than Solr? If so, I'd be very interested in the comparison results for our use cases. Regards, Faidon _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
