Sorry about that. Two weeks is indeed *not* the norm. Most repositories (from what I can tell) are created pretty quickly. However, if we're encouraging extension developers to stick to Gerrit, the occasional edge case might put a bad taste in somebody's mouth (as for me, I'm a patient man ;) ). *--* *Tyler Romeo* Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015 Major in Computer Science www.whizkidztech.com | tylerro...@gmail.com
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 8:52 PM, Ori Livneh <o...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > > > On Monday, October 22, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Ori Livneh wrote: > > > > > > > On Monday, October 22, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Tyler Romeo wrote: > > > > > Agreed on what Daniel said. I'd much prefer to keep my extensions on > > > Gerrit, but it becomes slightly frustrating when you have to wait two > weeks > > > for the repository to be created. > > > > > > > > > > FWIW I happened to request a repository on Saturday night and it was > ready for me this morning (both times PST). Looking at the history of the > requests page, it looks like quick turnarounds are the norm. I'd also like > repository creation rights to be expanded, but I don't think being > hyperbolic with criticism helps move things along. > Tyler, I read your e-mail as implying that two-week waits are the norm. It > now occurs to me that you may have been referring to a specific case. If > so, I misread -- disregard my reply. > > > -- > Ori Livneh > o...@wikimedia.org > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
