On Tue, 2012-12-11 at 19:30 -0800, James Forrester wrote: > This is not the final form of the VisualEditor in lots of different > ways. We know of a number of bugs, and we expect you to find more. We > do not recommend people trying to use the VisualEditor for their > regular editing yet. We would love your feedback on what we have done > so far – whether it’s a problem you discovered, an aspect that you > find confusing, what area you think we should work on next, or > anything else, please do let us know.[1] > > [1] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Feedback
Playing the bad cop who's reading random feedback pages daily: As https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/VisualEditor/Feedback also exists I wonder if the VisualEditor deployment on en.wp and its related feedback is so different from upstream that it needs a separate feedback page (instead of e.g. a soft redirect to the mw: one), or other reasons. Or does the en.wp one somehow make it easier for testers to report issues? When we deploy VE to other Wikipedias, will there also be separate VE feedback pages (maybe due to the different languages)? Note: I'm not criticizing it, I'm just trying to understand, and I'm picking VE as the most recent example. Thanks in advance for explaining, andre -- Andre Klapper | Wikimedia Bugwrangler http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
