I support this. It would give me time to follow up with assignees after a bug day before the next bug day.
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Quim Gil <q...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > On 01/17/2013 09:54 AM, Chris McMahon wrote: > >> How would this affect the notion of Groups? >> http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/**Groups/Proposals<http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Groups/Proposals> >> > > In a positive way. ;) > > If after every week sprint a group gets one contributor more, then the > chances of having a better next sprint will increase. > > Following the proposal, we don't need formal MediaWiki groups start > turning the wheel. With Chris, Andre, Zeljko and Valerie we have enough to > push the cycles. > > Of course each activity will need to have participants, and these > participants might be interested in staying in touch, discuss and plan > other tasks. This is where the groups might help to coordinate and generate > better week sprints. > > I haven't been around long enough, but one problem we seem to have is that > even successful activities leave little heritage for future events. Apart > from the people continuously engaged e.g. through this list, it's almost > like we are starting from scratch every time. Hopefully the groups will > help bridging activities and growing continuously. > > > -- > Quim Gil > Technical Contributor Coordinator @ Wikimedia Foundation > http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/**User:Qgil<http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Qgil> > > ______________________________**_________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l<https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l> > _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
