Hello, The proposal has been updated with edited time-scope. Bug 47742 has been reopened and marked dependent to 43126<https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43126>, SyntaxHighlight. I've noticed that SyntaxHighlight is a different component from VisualEditor in the Bugzilla, but they are connected through various dependencies. Should I change my proposal title to make it a SyntaxHighlight plugin? Thank you!
Tongbo 2013/4/26 Tongbo Sui <beanixs...@gmail.com> > Hello Sumana, > Thank you for your input! I was intended to link it to bug 47742 but my > but report was marked duplicate to 43133 and closed after the previous > email was send out. Although I don't agree with that decision but I'm > not sure if I should reopen my report. So right now it links to bug 43133. > I will rethink the time allotment and update on the proposal. Thank you! > > Tongbo > > (Sorry for the confusion that I directly replied to Sumana) > > > > On 4/26/2013 1:59 PM, Sumana Harihareswara wrote: > >> On 04/26/2013 01:48 PM, Tongbo Sui wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> Here is my proposal for a VisualEditor plugin. >>> Proposal: >>> https://www.mediawiki.org/**wiki/User:Beanixster<https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Beanixster> >>> Bugzilla track: >>> https://bugzilla.wikimedia.**org/show_bug.cgi?id=47742<https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47742> >>> >>> Thank you very much for your time. >>> >>> Tongbo Sui >>> ______________________________**_________________ >>> Wikitech-l mailing list >>> Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l<https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l> >>> >> Hi and welcome to our community, Tongbo Sui. >> >> Did you mean to link to Bug 43133, "VisualEditor: Fly-out wikitext >> editor for alienated content"? >> >> You should scope your proposal at about 6 weeks of coding work and >> dedicate the entire last month of the summer to bugfixing and code >> review. In the past, proposals that allotted less than that for merging >> with trunk, pre-deploy code review, testing and bugfixes, documentation, >> and integration just didn't get to their goals at the end of the summer. >> I think smaller scoping would have helped, so in the future, I think we >> should simply not accept proposals that do not allot at least a third of >> the summer to code review and response to code review. (And I think >> you'll need more ramp-up time during the Community Bonding Period than >> you have allotted here.) >> >> Best of luck! >> >> > _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
