Matthew Flaschen writes: > That would be great.
I see that's already been taken care of > Yes, doing it all client-side would probably be best for performance and > responsiveness, but some server-side involvement may be okay. However, > the current implementation at http://lilypond.org/schikkers/?user=demo > of responding with a JavaScript version of a full SVG document for each > change does raise performance questions. Sure, this demo still leaves much room for improvement and I would not suggest to use it as it is. It's pretty useless to work on performance if minimal required functionality is lacking, so that's one of the things I would like to hear. > I don't think they've been contacted about the VisualEditor. They were > emailed when the Score extension was in-progress, and they I assume they > know about that by now. Yes, of course. Thanks, Jan -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <jann...@gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
