* Strainu wrote: >> wget "http://despresate.strainu.ro/judet.php?id=15&f=xml&t=all&commune=all"; >> -O 1.xml >2013-07-15 00:37:58 (178 KB/s) - `1.xml' saved [31081]
That uses U+021B and not U+0163. U+021B was not allowed in element type names in the fourth edition of the XML 1.0 specification (but is allowed now in the fifth edition). >Still, it seems to me that unicode char support in tag names is >sketchy. Would you recommend that I go ahead with those names or it >would be wiser, for the sake of reusers, to keep to the ascii letters? If you stick to the characters allowed in the fourth edition only, see <http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-20060816/#NT-Name>, you should have only the usual problems (like using the non-ascii characters in source code meant to process documents of this kind and failing due to i18n issues in their programming environment). -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjo...@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
