Maybe you want to read this article: http://xiphmont.livejournal.com/61927.html
lbenedix m Do 31.10.2013 10:26, schrieb Brion Vibber: > We're churning through some internal discussion with legal on if and how > how this affects our potential options... > > Note that the specific thing announced there doesn't include a licensed AAC > *audio* codec which would be required to generate audio and video+audio > files playable on current browsers from Apple and Microsoft... so while an > interesting development in the codec wars, we don't expect it to > immediately change much for us. > > -- brion > > > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 2:10 AM, Magnus Manske > <magnusman...@googlemail.com>wrote: > >> http://gigaom.com/2013/10/30/mozilla-will-add-h-264-to-firefox-as-cisco-makes-eleventh-hour-push-for-webrtcs-future/?t=t >> >> So, should we support this format now? (not advocating, just curious) >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikitech-l mailing list >> Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
