That's probably more a topic for Wiki-research-l than for Wikitech-l (in particular since they seem to have published formulas rather than code). BTW, we briefly reviewed this preprint in the Wikimedia Research Newsletter back when the first version came out: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Newsletter/2012/June#Central_users_produce_higher_quality
Also, there is quite a few other research out there about automatically assessing article quality - last year, there was even a small competition for such algorithms: http://www.webis.de/research/events/pan-12 On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Juliusz Gonera <jgon...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > I haven't read the paper itself, but just in case someone has a moment and > is interested: > http://www.technologyreview.com/view/520946/can-automated-editorial-tools-help-wikipedias-declining-volunteer-workforce/ > > -- > Juliusz > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l -- Tilman Bayer Senior Operations Analyst (Movement Communications) Wikimedia Foundation IRC (Freenode): HaeB _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
