That is a statement, not an explanation. John On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Jon Robson <jdlrob...@gmail.com> wrote: > From personal experience don't touch cache manifests with a barge pole... > > Bear in mind the majority of browsers provide at least 5mb of local storage > and we are talking about caching a few kB at most of minified JavaScript.... > On 7 Nov 2013 00:35, "Daniel Friesen" <dan...@nadir-seen-fire.com> wrote: > >> Cache manifests are extremely inflexible. The HTTP caching we already >> have is more flexible than cache manifests. So cache manifests won't >> help make any improvements. >> >> ~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://danielfriesen.name/] >> >> On 2013-11-07 12:19 AM, John Erling Blad wrote: >> > Can you explain why you use LocalStorage for this? It seems to me like >> > this is the wrong solution and you should use cache manifests instead. >> > LocalStorage is a quite limited area for _data_ storage and it will >> > create problems if we start wasting that space for _code_ storage. >> > >> > John >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikitech-l mailing list >> Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
_______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
