Very little. Currently, enwiki has one broken module [ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Scribunto_modules_with_errors] and dewiki has none [ https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kategorie:Wikipedia:Modul_mit_Syntaxfehler].
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 2:16 PM, David Gerard <dger...@gmail.com> wrote: > So how much broken Lua is out there in the wild on WMF wikis? > > On 29 September 2014 01:17, Jackmcbarn <jackmcb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Scribunto has an option to allow code to be saved even if it contains > > syntax errors that prevent it from ever working. The original reason for > > this feature was to make it more convenient to save incomplete code. > > However, in practice, this has never been used for its intended purpose, > > and users who don't know any Lua are breaking otherwise-functional > modules > > with it. Because of this, and because it's easy enough to save incomplete > > code by simply wrapping it all in a multiline comment, I plan to remove > the > > option unless objections are raised. > > > > Jackmcbarn > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikitech-l mailing list > > Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
