On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Quim Gil <q...@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> Tagging describes Phabricator projects a lot better than nesting. In > Phabricator, projects are tags and tags are projects. This means that even > if the "subproject" concept is officially missing today, you can organize > your work in a similar way. > I partially agree, but just *partially* :) Tagging is just a poor man's version of classing, since it doesn't let you define the relationship between tags. True that you can put any task in several projects/tags, the problem is that the project structure is nevertheless flat: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/project/query/all/ Which will become cumbersome to navigate for occasional visitors as the number of projects goes up. Exactly. If sister projects want to have Phabricator projects, they could > have them. But there us hundreds of them, so we better coordinate first. > David, thank you for providing a good excuse to create this task: > Hundreds of them? :D Last time I checked there were between 1 and 12 sisters projects, depending on whom you ask. But if you meant to create projects for each language version of each sister project, then I agree that it would be too much. OTOH, with a proper organization it could be innovative to manage far-reaching content projects through phabricator ;) Cheers, Micru _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
