Quim Gil <q...@wikimedia.org> writes:

> We need a healthy MediaWiki open source software project in the first
> place. Without this, no committee, dictator or CTO will save the project in
> the long run.

Agreed.

> While the Wikimedia Foundation plays a key role in the development of
> MediaWiki, the structure of the open source project must be driven by
> community merit. The MediaWiki platform roadmap should be discussed and
> agreed at a community level.

Thank you for saying this.

You also re-iterated Tim's point about ArchCom's powerlessness and
pointed to some ways to address that.

I would also suggest that an effort be made to find community members
who are not WMF employees to participate in the ArchCom and then to have
their voices heard during in quarterly planning.

You also suggested that we "[identify] key MediaWiki platform areas and
their architects / maintainers".

If we look at the whole MW ecosystem, I sure we'll find that some key
platform areas have maintainers who are not WMF employees.

Mark.


-- 
Mark A. Hershberger
NicheWork LLC
717-271-1084

_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to