We've also inserted back-dated log entries into meta.wikimedia.org's log
before in https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T89205 - I'm not aware of any
negative side-effects.

On 7 April 2015 at 18:33, Helder . <helder.w...@gmail.com> wrote:

> See also
> https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T54919
>
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Daniel Barrett <d...@cimpress.com> wrote:
> > Will anything bad happen if entries in the MediaWiki "logging" table are
> not inserted in chronological order?
> >
> > Due to a bug, our logging table has incomplete data. I'd like to insert
> the missing data using a script.
> > However, the log_id column is auto-increment. This means that when the
> table is ordered by log_id,
> > the data will not be in chronological order by log_timestamp.
> >
> > Is that bad in any way?
> > Or are all applications (like Special:Log) expected to "order by
> log_timestamp" rather than log_id?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Dan
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikitech-l mailing list
> > Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikitech-l mailing list
> Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
>
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to