Luke081515 set up #wikimedia-codereview on freenode and I'm going to try to figure out some time slots that might work. I think we should start with once or twice a week and expand from there.
Further input is welcome either here or on the task: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T128371 On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Greg Grossmeier <g...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > Forwarding to engineering@ to get more visibility from WMF engineers who > have +2 and/or who want to experiment with a possible way of doing > code-review office hours. > > There's a vote on the task to show your interest if you have it: > https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T128371 > > Greg > > ----- Forwarded message from Greg Grossmeier <g...@wikimedia.org> ----- > > > Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 14:22:03 -0700 > > From: Greg Grossmeier <g...@wikimedia.org> > > To: Wikimedia developers <wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org> > > Subject: [Wikitech-l] Code review office hours (was Re: Improving > Wikimedia's Code Review process) > > Reply-To: Wikimedia developers <wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org> > > > > Changing subject to focus on the code-review office hours idea. > > > > Also, a request at the end for people with +2 to indicate if they would > > be willing to participate in an experiment or not :) > > > > <quote name="Jon Robson" date="2016-03-16" time="15:47:49 -0700"> > > > We have two swat windows every day. It's magical... I post a request > for a > > > deploy on a Wiki page and someone deploys it. > > > > :) glad you like it > > > > > Could we try a similar thing with code review. Code review window > (maximum > > > 1 patch per person) and have a group of +2ers look at a maximum set of > > > patches? > > > > > > It would need a few more rules than that and a bit of tweaking but > seems > > > like a good experiment. I'd sign up to help it if it was a maximum 2 > > > windows for me a week. > > > > That sounds like an interesting idea indeed, Jon. > > > > An action item from me from the DevSummit was > > https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T128371, which is basically "setup > > code-review office hours" without much more detail than that (it was a > > drive-by idea during one of the sessions that I volunteered to follow-up > > with). > > > > My initial idea was very minimal (basically just a time and a virtual > > place to do code-review together) but adding in the explicit support of > > +2ers helping merge ready patches during the time gives it more > > effectiveness. > > > > The hardest part will, I assume, be getting enough people with commit > > rights to volunteer for at least one day/week. > > > > Any one reading this far with +2 willing to? If so, please comment on > > the task (to save the mailing list): > > https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T128371 > > > > Thanks, > > > > Greg > > > > -- > > | Greg Grossmeier GPG: B2FA 27B1 F7EB D327 6B8E | > > | identi.ca: @greg A18D 1138 8E47 FAC8 1C7D | > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikitech-l mailing list > > Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > -- > | Greg Grossmeier GPG: B2FA 27B1 F7EB D327 6B8E | > | identi.ca: @greg A18D 1138 8E47 FAC8 1C7D | > > _______________________________________________ > Engineering mailing list > engineer...@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/engineering > _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
