MZMcBride wrote: > rupert THURNER wrote: >>quim, i would not be angry if you would show a little bit more empathy >>towards a client, a volunteer. if mzmcbride is right and there is a >>well established procedure to change this page which was not followed, >>the person not following might read the "expected behaviour" page. > > Project portals such as www.wikipedia.org were managed on Meta-Wiki: > <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Project_portals>. I believe most of the > portals continue to be managed on Meta-Wiki, with the exception of > www.wikipedia.org; background: <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T110070>.
ah, interesting. moving this to git sounds ok to me from a technical viewpoint. i read https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikipedia.org_Portal/Migration_to_gerrit. despite that i am not clear how the current portal maintainers would then activate a proposal e.g. from the discovery team? rupert _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l