MZMcBride wrote:
> rupert THURNER wrote:
>>quim, i would not be angry if you would show a little bit more empathy
>>towards a client, a volunteer. if mzmcbride is right and there is a
>>well established procedure to change this page which was not followed,
>>the person not following might read the "expected behaviour" page.
>
> Project portals such as www.wikipedia.org were managed on Meta-Wiki:
> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Project_portals>. I believe most of the
> portals continue to be managed on Meta-Wiki, with the exception of
> www.wikipedia.org; background: <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T110070>.

ah, interesting. moving this to git sounds ok to me from a technical
viewpoint. i read
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikipedia.org_Portal/Migration_to_gerrit.
despite that i am not clear how the current portal maintainers would
then activate a proposal e.g. from the discovery team?

rupert

_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to