On Wed, 2016-06-01 at 04:23 +0200, Danny B. wrote: > If tasks were properly triaged and tagged, it would be easy to create > various quite accurate statistics.
If you think that tasks aren't "properly triaged" currently, could you elaborate what specifically you'd like to see changed? > But attempts to create tags which would allow it were and are > unfortunatelly being questioned, delayed, stalled or even declined. Do you have specific examples? I do ask for usecases on proposed tags when I don't see how they'd support those folks managing and fixing tasks, as I'd like to avoid categorizing for the sake of categorizing (+people need to do the categorizing, which triggers notifications). > In one of my previous jobs, where I was taking care of the bugtracker as a > part of my duty, after I made an order in it, the number of opened tasks > decreased to nearly 70% of the original count. Was that a public bugtracker where anyone could file tasks and anyone could work on tasks (FOSS project?), or an internal instance? Cheers, andre > Then after some statistics I' > ve ran from the new data, our teams became more effective and productive due > to having better data to work with and at the end of the consolidation > process, we ended up in oscilating between 30-50% of the original amount of > opened tasks. > > I wish it was possible to achieve the same here... -- Andre Klapper | Wikimedia Bugwrangler http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
