Can we have a static website at git.wikimedia.org with some dev curated
phab links to the most important projects ?

On Wed, 22 Jun 2016 06:43 Platonides, <platoni...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 21/06/16 23:16, Greg Grossmeier wrote:
> > == tl;dr ==
> > On June 29th git.wikimedia.org (running Gitblit) will redirect all
> > requests to Phabricator. The vast majority of requests will be correctly
> > redirected.
> >
> > == What is happening? ==
> > In an effort to reduce the maintenance burden of redudant services we
> > will be removing git.wikimedia.org. The software that has been serving
> > git.wikimedia.org, Gitblit, has given our Operations team many headaches
> > over the years[0] and now that we have all repositories hosted in
> > Phabricator[1] there is no reason to keep Gitblit around. Phabricator's
> > Diffusion (the name of the code browser) provides the needed
> > functionality that Gitblit served (mostly viewing/browsing repositories,
> > something which Gerrit does not do).
>
>
> I hear this with dismay. When I wanted to view the repository online in
> the past, I always ended up heading to git.wikimedia.org, since I was
> unable to *find* the repository at phabricator.
> At most, phabricator showed a somewhat related diffusion commit.
>
> Gitblit may not be the most suited software regarding technical
> stability, but diffusion is far from having an acceptable UI,
> I'm afraid.
>
> ☹
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikitech-l mailing list
> Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to