As it always has since I've been here. But you're right. We should disable it.
-- Sent from my phone, please excuse brevity. On Dec 21, 2016 6:30 PM, "Alex Monk" <am...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > Although this is theoretically a deployment freeze week, in reality > l10nupdate is still running: > <logmsgbot> !log l10nupdate@tin scap sync-l10n completed (1.29.0-wmf.6) > (duration: 07m 54s) > > On 7 December 2016 at 17:39, Chad <innocentkil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 9:22 AM Alex Monk <am...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > > > > > Are we also going to be disabling l10nupdate then? That's surely more > > risky > > > than syncing beta's files (which aren't even loaded by production > > apaches) > > > > > > > > Sounds like a plan! > > > > -Chad > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikitech-l mailing list > > Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > > > > > > -- > Alex Monk > VisualEditor/Editing team > https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/User:Krenair_(WMF) > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
