Daniel Kinzler wrote: >* ArchCom is considering changes to the RFC process. Discussion is >ongoing.
Where is discussion ongoing? >Key points: >** More focus on discussion in Phabricator >** More leight weight process for “small” RFCs >** ArchCom to focus more on review, less ond process >** IRC meeting should not be the primary tool for discussing and >approving RFCs I don't know what primary tool means. There are benefits to both asynchronous and synchronous discussions. The IRC meetings in particular have the benefit of being scheduled and regularly recurring, which can be a good nudge for people to finish drafting a task or wiki page, to make a decision to accept or decline, to comment on a proposal, etc. MZMcBride _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
