I see. Pity. Igal On Jul 31, 2017 19:38, "Akeron" <akeron...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It depends of the size of the dataset, if you already know the pages or > users you want to compare (limited dataset with reasonable quantity) then > there is no scalability issue and it should not be too difficult to > implement. Otherwise it require a lot of resources to merge the numbers for > every pages or users over the period with a large dataset. > > > 2017-07-31 16:59 GMT+02:00 יגאל חיטרון <khit...@gmail.com>: > > > Thank you. I will not say that I understood your explanation, but I'll > try: > > If you have number of viewers of some page for every year, can't you get > > the sum of them and compare with another page to sort them? And the same > > for the number of some user's edits? > > Igal > > > > On Jul 31, 2017 17:19, "Akeron" <akeron...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi Igal, > > > All suggestions are welcome :) > > > Supporting this feature shouldn't be too difficult in theory because it > > is > > > already working with this kind of aggregation (month are built from > days, > > > years from months...). The main problem is scalability for stats which > > > require uniqueness like number of users or number of edits *per page*. > > > That's why yearly stats can actually be disabled on some big wikis. So > it > > > would be feasible but with edits limitations for the range (like 3-5 > > > millions) and it would be very slow to load with lots of edits. > > > > > > Akeron > > > > > > 2017-07-31 14:29 GMT+02:00 יגאל חיטרון <khit...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > > Hello. It's amazing, thank you very much! > > > > Could I suggest one more feature, please? With it, the tool will be > > > > perfect. I'm talking about aggregation. Any kind of historical > > statistics > > > > for some day, month or year can be also shown as range of time. For > > > > example, if we have month statistics, we could fill From field to be > > Jan > > > > 2008 and To field to be May 2011, and get the aggregated numbers for > > this > > > > range. Is it possible? > > > > Thank you very much again, > > > > Igal (User:IKhitron) > > > > > > > > On Jul 30, 2017 22:18, "Pine W" <wiki.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Wikiscan is an interesting tool for statistics fans. I suggest > > briefly > > > > > reading this IEG page > > > > > <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IEG/Wikiscan_multi-wiki>, > > then > > > > > playing with the tool on https://wikiscan.org/ > > > > > > > > > > Pine > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > Wikitech-l mailing list > > > > > Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org > > > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Wikitech-l mailing list > > > > Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org > > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Wikitech-l mailing list > > > Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikitech-l mailing list > > Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
