I don't think WMF should be hiring contractors purely for the purpose of
supporting individual tools which are not in production.

On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 at 15:46, Pine W <wiki.p...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi DJ,
>
> Out of curiosity, what all would be involved in the OS change?
>
> The bike layers could be a nontrivial loss for some folks.
>
> If no regular WMF staff are available for the OS changes and ongoing
> maintenance, and if the use of bike lanes (or other features) is
> significant in the opinion of the community, then I think that WMF
> contractor time should be an option for the changes and maintenance,
> although I would like to know how much that would cost before supporting
> that option, along with how strongly bike lanes (and other features
> supported by these servers) are wanted by the community. If the community
> has no strong feelings regarding the loss of these features and the
> contactor time would cost $30,000 in the first year then maybe the loss of
> these features is acceptable, but if there is significant community desire
> to maintain these features and the contractor time would cost $1,000 in the
> first year then I would probably support spending the money for contractor
> time for at least one year of additional service while WMF tries to recruit
> volunteers for future years. In the context of a $100 million annual
> budget, I am fairly confident that WMF could find $1,000 for an additional
> year of service.
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018, 5:39 AM Derk-Jan Hartman <
> d.j.hartman+wmf...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > This is just another small reminder that, because the servers which host
> > tiles.wmflabs.org and wma.wmflabs.org (wikiminiatlas)  and overpass-wiki
> > run on a version of the OS (Ubuntu Trusty) that is no longer supported
> > (and hasn't been available for new instances since november 2017).
> >
> > These services need maintainers and support by community members in order
> > to keep them alive after dec 18th (after which wmflabs will phase out
> those
> > versions) and before the EOL of early 2019 of the OS. Unfortunately it
> > seems no one is stepping up so far to convert these machines.
> >
> > This issue is tracked at https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T204506
> > As I was curious, I looked around on the tile server a bit and used what
> I
> > could find to update
> > https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/OSM_Tileserver#Technology_stack
> > This is all the information that I could gather, but i'm FAR from sure if
> > that is complete information and if I would break anything with a rebuild
> > basing myself on that info, so any information on missing elements etc.
> > would be appreciated. I've not gotten around to looking at wikiminiatlas.
> >
> > If the services are not rebuild then likely they will just disappear at
> > some point for all layer variants. This includes the mapnik, black and
> > white, hill shading, hike bike layers. As I have no idea how many users
> of
> > these services there are, it is hard to say what the effect of that would
> > be.
> >
> > DJ
> > _______________________________________________
> > Maps-l mailing list
> > map...@lists.wikimedia.org
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/maps-l
> >
> --
>
> Pine
> ( https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pine )
> _______________________________________________
> Wikitech-l mailing list
> Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to