So I think that once you are familiar with xml, it's good too, right? I think we'll need a part of XHTML, not all of them, and some additional tags only. It won't be too difficult.
2008/2/19, Thomas Dalton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On 18/02/2008, Minh Lê Ngọc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I saw we get a lot of troubles with wikitext. I wonder this idea is > > possible: we will concentrate to build a wysiwyg editor which produces > > xml-like content so that: > > > > people don't have to know any wiki language > > developer is able to forget wikitext and its complexityTo prove that it > is > > possible with a friend of mine, I had write a xml-like language for wiki > (in > > Vietnamese). I can ask him to translate it into English (because I'm not > > really good in English). > > There is the obvious issue with backwards compatibility there, > although that can be overcome with work. The other major issue is that > no WYSIWYG system is likely to be as powerful as wikitext, or as quick > and easy to use (for experienced users). WYSIWYG is certainly much > easier for new users, but once you are familiar with wikitext, it is > generally better. > _______________________________________________ > Wikitext-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitext-l >
_______________________________________________ Wikitext-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitext-l
