2010-08-27 23:11, David Gerard skrev: > On 27 August 2010 19:00, Andreas Jonsson<[email protected]> wrote: > > >> The performance isn't very impressive. >> I've tried very quickly to make a comparison: >> > > It's comparable, and I'm amazed! > > :-O >
I would have thought that a "real" parser would clearly be ahead on any input, but maybe I'm underestimating the original parser. Anyway, there should be room for optimizations. Profiling shows that about 64% of the time is spent in the parser, while 25% of the time is spent in the lexer. To me it seems that the parser have an easier task to do than the lexer, and should therefore be faster. > So ... is it fit for people to drop into place and experiment with? > > No, not yet. Some features are missing and there is no php-integration yet. But unless I've missed something, there is nothing that I don't immediately know how to implement. /Andreas > This should really be reported more widely :-) I posted on my blog > about it (and have now linked this message and the svn). Worth > announcing on mediawiki-l? Presumably when it's drop-in. > > > - d. > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitext-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitext-l > > _______________________________________________ Wikitext-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitext-l
