I suspect the main problem with running XP on such a slow system is that the install process declines to install on a system that MS indicated was not powerful enough to run XP.
Installing on a faster system, and then moving the hard drive to the old system (before activation) may get round that JimB. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Harondel J. Sibble" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 7:11 AM Subject: Re: Which is more stable Win98, SE or ME? > On 7 Jun 2005 at 19:37, Wayne Johnson wrote: > > > > actually believe that they could put XP or XP64 on PII-150 since the WinHome > > Actually XP will run on that vintage chip, I saw a P-120 with 80 or 96mb > running XP once. To say it was a dog would be an understatement. > > > OBTW Roger & FWIW, ME is NOT a flavor of 98 strictly speaking but it is > > half way between 98se & XP which imho is an abomination but as always YMMV. > > Not even remotely close to half way, more like 30% away from 98SE..... > > Oh and it never worked properly either. > -- > Harondel J. Sibble > Sibble Computer Consulting > Creating solutions for the small business and home computer user. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (use pgp keyid 0x3AD5C11D) http://www.pdscc.com > (604) 739-3709 (voice/fax) (604) 686-2253 (pager) > > -- > ---------------------------------------- > WIN-HOME Archives: http://PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM/archives/WIN-HOME.html > Contact the List Owner about problems: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Unofficial Win-Home List Members Profiles Page > http://winhome.wavijo.com/ > > -- ---------------------------------------- WIN-HOME Archives: http://PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM/archives/WIN-HOME.html Contact the List Owner about problems: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unofficial Win-Home List Members Profiles Page http://winhome.wavijo.com/
