Is this list moderated at all? I keep getting spams bounced off the list server.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > What I want here is sort of an INTERNAL_IsBadReadPointer that doesn't > generate a fault, but I haven't found one. I think the API is faulty > enough that we don't need to add any extra faults to it. I guess I > could invent one if it seems to be a good idea, but I thought I'd like > to ask first before I reinvent the wheel. I'm not sure why you don't want to generate a fault (or how you would do it for that matter). What's wrong with wrapping the whole function inside an exception handler? -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
